The Naked Mughals Page 3

  When Bahadur Shah died, his four sons again fought against each other. Three of them were murdered in a complex four-sided battle, and Jahandar Shah became the ruler.

  Meanwhile, Farukh Siyar, nephew of Jahandar also announced his claim. With the help of the powerful Sayid brothers who became virtual rulers, he defeated and killed Jahandar.

  After becoming emperor, Farukh planned to get out of clutches of Sayid brothers. But they attacked Farukh and had him blinded and imprisoned. Later he was strangulated to death.

  Then Jahandar’s son Muhammad Shah Rangila was made the emperor by Sayid brothers. He was smart enough to defeat them and then murder.

  During Rangila’s rule, Nadir Shah attacked India. This Nadir Shah had become emperor by murdering Abbas, the young son of Shah of Iran. In 1743, he had eyes of his own son gouged out. He was the enemy of both Shias and idol worshippers. Finally, Nadir Shah was also murdered by his nephew Ali Kuli Khan along with his thirteen sons and grandsons. One grandson managed to save his life, and he ran away to Austria to serve the kings there.

  After Nadir Shah, Ahmad Shah, his general, took control of the empire who exceeded Nadir Shah in brutality. He invaded India several times making Mughals weaker and weaker. The Sikhs effectively checked him. He was succeeded by Timur after which his sons again started a bloody battle. His 5th son Zaman took the throne but was blinded and imprisoned for next 40 years till he died. The other brothers and their children kept murdering each other for expansion of their split empires.

  Coming back to affairs with Mughals, after Rangila died, his son Ahmad Shah became the namesake emperor. Eventually, he was removed by Marathas and the second son of Jahandar took the throne in the name of Alamgir II. This new Alamgir (earlier was the killing machine called Aurangzeb) had Ahmad Shah, and his mother blinded within a week.

  His courtiers murdered Alamgir II in 1759. By this time the Mughal rule had come to an end, and for next 100 years, they only lived on pension by British and a territory confined to Red Fort. He was followed by Shah Jahan III, another production of royal harem. But soon he was also deposed by Afghans, and his kingmakers ran away forever. What happened of him is not known.

  After this, Shah Alam II, the son of Alamgir II became the namesake emperor in 1761. In 1788, Ghulam Qadir, son of his minister, brought emperor and his family to streets. He raped the royal women and asked an artist to paint the picture of the way he gouged the eyes of Shah Alam II, sitting on his chest. Ghulam Qadir said that he is doing so because Shah Alam II had done the same with his family earlier.

  Eventually, Marathas captured this Ghulam Qadir and handed over to Mughals who then cut him into pieces over several days in most brutal manner and made the public display of the same. Finally, they left him to be eaten by a dog. The blind Shah Alam II was restored as emperor of Red Fort as a mercy.

  After Shah Alam II died in 1806, his son Akbar succeeded as a pensioner of British. He was followed by the 62-year-old Bahadur Shah Zafar. This time there was no fight for succession because they were scared that British might kill them.

  Summary is clear

  When these representatives of Islam could not be faithful to their own father, brothers, sisters and children, how can we expect them to be human enough to promote compassion among rest of Muslims and non-Muslims? And how can those who glorify such perverts conduct any other noble act apart from terrorism?

  Mughal scions need to be questioned. However, the Mughals need not be erased from the history but should be taught as classical examples of treachery, bigotry and tyrannical reign of foreigners.

  CHAPTER 3

  BABUR – A DRUG ADDICT PEDOPHILE

  Babur was not a Muslim in the first place as per Islamic definitions. He would have been stoned to death long ago if he were to live today in any Muslim country!

  In reality, Babur was a disgrace in the name of Islam. To know Babur better let us not depend on claims of Hindu ‘fundamentalists’ or biased ‘right-winged’ historians. Let us instead hear from the horse’s mouth. Let us review the autobiography of Babur – Baburnama – which is available in all prominent languages.

  For the purpose of this chapter, we shall refer to the English translation by Annette Susannah Beveridge published in 1922. This translation was done directly from whatever portions of original Turkish manuscript were available. These suffice to establish the true character of Babur.

  Babur – the homosexual drunkard child molester

  The autobiography clearly establishes Babur as a compulsive homosexual child molester. So those defending Babri Masjid should first clearly explain if Islam justifies homosexuality and child molestation. If not, Babur was a disgrace in the name of Islam, and hence any structure constructed by him is also a disgrace in the name of Islam.

  In Page 120-121 of the biography, Babur says that he was not much interested in his wife but was maddened by a boy named Babri. He confesses that he had not loved anyone like he was mad for this boy. Babur used to compose verses in the love of the boy. For example: “There has been no lover except me who is so sad, passionate and insulted. And there is no one more cruel and wretched than my lover!”

  He says that Babri used to come ‘close’ to him and that used to make Babur so excited that he could not even utter a word. Because of being intoxicated, he could not even thank Babri for his show of love.

  Once Babur was roaming with his friends, and when Babri came in front of him in a lane, Babur had loss of speech and could not even look at him due to the excitement. He narrated: “I get embarrassed looking at my lover. My friends leer at me, and I leer at someone else.”

  He admits that in passion and desire of youth, he got mad and used to roam around the naked head and naked foot without even looking at anything else.

  He writes, “I used to get mad in excitement and passion. I could not think that lovers have to face this. I could not go away from you, nor can I stay with you due to a high level of excitement. You have made me completely mad, O my (male) lover!”

  Now this proves beyond doubt that:

  Babur and his gangs were homosexual and child molesters.

  Punishment for these, as per Islamic Shariat, is death by stoning. This is prevalent even today in Islamic countries.

  Babri Masjid is nothing but a memoir in the name of Babur’s sex partner who was named Babri.

  Does Islam consider monuments created by or named after such sexual perverts to be mosques or symbols of shame?

  Babur – the barbaric killer, looter, rapist, drunkard and drug addict

  (Only a few samples from this barbaric vulgar autobiography of Babur are being provided here as it is too brutal and gross for detailed reading.)

  – Page 232: He writes that his gang beheaded the innocent Afghans who came to him for a truce, and then created a pillar from these heads. The same feat was repeated in Hangu where 200 Afghan heads were cut to create a pillar.

  – Page 370: Because people of Bajaur did not believe in Islam, more than 3000 people were murdered, and their wives and children were taken as captives.

  – Page 371: Several heads of captured people were sent to Kabutl, Balkh and other places to spread news of victory.

  – Page 371: A tower of cut heads was set up on the ground to celebrate the victory.

  – Page 371: There was a wine party on Muharram where we drank whole night. (Translator notes here that Babur was a heavy drunkard till end of his life). A large portion of Baburnama describes these wine parties.

  – Page 373: Babur took such intoxicants once that he could not go even for prayers. He further says that had he taken such intoxicants today, he would not have produced half the intoxication.

  – Page 374: Babur fathered several children with several women in his brothel. His first wife promised to adopt all his future illegitimate children because several children born to her could not live. It looks as if Babur’s brothel was akin to a poultry farm for chicken production!

&n
bsp; – Page 385-388: Babur was so happy with the birth of Humayun that he went to a boat with his friends and drank wine all night and took narcotics. Then they fought with each other due to intoxication and party broke up. After a similar party, he vomited a lot and forgot everything by morning.

  – Page 527: A party was given in the pillared porch of the domed building in Agra (Referring to Taj Mahal falsely associated with Shah Jahan).

  Almost all pages of his autobiography describe how he looted, threatened, murdered and plundered wherever he went and ate ‘Haram’ (forbidden in Islam) meat. Note that the way Babur includes all this in his autobiography implies that he was proud of all this. One would shudder to imagine what all other crimes he had committed that do not form part of this self-eulogizing biography.

  Summary

  Babur was anything but a follower of Islam, going by his misdeeds that can put any human to shame. And if indeed some perverts assert that Babur was still a Muslim as per their definition of Islam, then there can be nothing more disgusting than that definition of Islam.

  Babri Masjid was named after Babur’s homosexual partner Babri.

  Muslims should stop associating themselves with perverted misdeeds of these looters and terrorists who were anything but followers of Islam. They should stop calling these criminals Muslims and their noble ancestors. Instead, they should associate with our true, noble ancestors like Ram and Krishna.

  CHAPTER 4

  AKBAR - THE GREAT BUTCHER

  Very chosen few legends in Indian history had the privilege of being honored with the suffix ‘the Great’ or ‘Mahaan’ after their names. I recall only three – Alexander, Ashoka, and Akbar. This great title does not come easily. Indeed, one has to display exemplary greatness to be called ‘great.' This great land has produced one legend after another – Ram, Krishna, Vikramaditya, Prithviraj, Rana Pratap, Shivaji – to name a few. But none qualified to be called ‘the Great’ by our noble historians.

  This is because the criteria for being called ‘the Great’ are very tough. You have to be simply the best killer for times to come to be called ‘the Great.' And you must be a basher of mainstream Hinduism in some way or the other.

  Alexander was the first such terrorist who killed innumerable to quench his thirst for global conquest. He got a nasty defeat at the hands of Porus and went back shamefully after having his life spared. But our glorious historians, who seem to take more passion as poets and creative writers, consider this to be the defeat of Porus. Incidentally, Greek historians are more candid to admit this defeat of Alexander! But that is beside the point. The fact remains that since he attacked and killed innumerable people, he is ‘Great’!

  Next was Ashoka, who got a sudden remorse after conducting the greatest bloodshed of his era. Once again, a favourite of our creative historians who even made a film out of his romantic affairs with one of his innumerable wives. But the bottom line is that since he broke all records of bloodshed even before the remorse and drifted away from mainstream Hinduism, he earned the title of ‘the Great’!

  And after him, for centuries, no one could repeat that feat. But then, came the era of barbaric looters from West Asia who broke all records of terrorism carrying the flag of ‘Islam’, thereby, making a mockery of Muhammad’s claim as Prophet of Peace! For centuries, there was a dispute with regards to who should get the coveted title of ‘the Great’. And then came the great Mughal, the noble descendant of Timur and Genghis Khan from father and mother sides respectively.

  Mughal carried the glorious lineage of the greatest rapist, looter, murderer, and homosexual child molester - the noble Babur - who has the rare honor of being on the cover page of history books for school students in India. Akbar, his grandson, surpassed all imaginations of barbarism and terrorism to earn the coveted ‘the Great’! And no one, not even Osama Bin Laden has been able to repeat that feat since then.

  We are ashamed of the ‘eminent’ historians who have referred to the most unreliable sources to portray the greatest butchers as greatest legends for the sake of secularism.

  With such traitors who needs enemies. This great nation has produced greatest of Tejasvi patriots but also traitors. And these days, traitors seem to be predominating. History seems to be an area almost totally infested with traitors. Second comes ‘Art, Culture & Entertainment’. Or are the both same?

  In this chapter, we shall provide summary points from Akbar’s life to understand what motivated Bollywood “star” to feel so honored to portray his noble character and our spineless populace to be so enchanted with the fictitious Jodha-Akbar stories. Our assertions are not on works of any ‘rightist’ historian (being right is always considered wrong in secular history!). But they are based on the works of greatest admirers of Akbar: Vincent Smith, whose ‘Akbar – the Great Mogul’ is considered the most authoritative book on Akbar, and of course, Abul Fazl – the sycophant who wrote Ain-e-Akbari and Akbarnama. All that we would do is to review what even the sycophants could not hide.

  Foundations of Akbar the Great

  Vincent Smith starts his book with “Akbar was a foreigner in India. He had not a drop of Indian blood in his veins…Akbar was more of a Turk than Mogul.” And we Indians proclaim him as an out-and-out Indian. His father, grandfather and in fact entire lineage represented the topmost terrorists of their eras (7th generation of Timur from the father and Genghis Khan from the mother) whose sole goal was to loot and plunder. And we claim him to be the pride of India!

  Beauty and Noble Habits of Akbar the Great

  Babur was a drunkard. Humayun became dumb due to the use of opium. Akbar imbibed both these ‘great’ qualities. Two children of Akbar died due to excessive consumption of narcotics. And we have Muslims taking pride in him!

  Bollywood star was excited to play the role of Akbar in the movie Jodha-Akbar. Historians call Akbar the most handsome person on earth. But here is his beauty as per Vincent Smith:

  “Akbar was of average height and walked with a limp in the left leg. His head was tilted on the right shoulder. His nose was small with protruding bone. His nostrils looked as if he is in anger. A wart of the size of half a pea joined his lip to the nostril. He was dark.”

  Jahangir writes that “Akbar used to call him Shekh regardless of he being intoxicated or alert. It implies that Akbar was usually intoxicated.”

  Akbar’s courtier Aquaviva writes that “Akbar had started drinking so much that he used to fall asleep talking to guests. He used to drink Taadi sometimes and Post other times. He used to start behaving like insane when drunk beyond the limit.”

  Education of Akbar the Great

  Jahangir writes that “Akbar used to behave as if he was a scholar despite the fact that he could not read or write.”

  Respect for women in Akbar the Great

  Abul Fazl states that “Akbar remained behind the ‘curtain’ (purdah) in his initial years as a king.” It is obvious what is meant by this.

  Abul Fazl describes Harem of Akbar: “It had 5000 women, and each woman had a separate home.” This is apart from more than 36 wives that he had.

  To describe the glory of his prince charming, Abul Fazl writes in Ain-e-Akbari:

  “Close to the home of Shahanshah Akbar, a bar has been set up. So many prostitutes aggregated there that it became difficult to keep a count. Courtiers used to take the dancers home. But if someone wanted to take home a virgin, he had to take permission from Akbar. Sometimes violence would happen among youth. Once Akbar himself called several prostitutes and asked who broke their virginity.”

  Now how could so many prostitutes aggregate at the same time? Obviously, they were women from Hindu families who were made captive or rendered homeless after their families were looted and butchered on an ongoing basis. Because Muslim women are supposed to be behind the veil and Akbar was constantly at war killing men and abducting women throughout his glorious career.

  In Akbarnama, Abul Fazl writes: “Whenever a Beghum or wives of
courtiers or virgins wanted to be enjoyed, they were supposed to send an application to Harem in-charge. Then their application would reach the palace authorities. After that, they were allowed to enter and stay in Harem for up to even one month.”

  It’s obvious that even wives of his courtiers were forced to be enjoyed by Jodha’s adorable Akbar for up to a month! Note that we are referring to works of his own sycophant and not any detractor.

  The first condition in the treaty of Ranathambhor was that Rajputs should dispatch Dolis of women to Royal Harem in return of freeing of soldiers. No wonder, why Jauhar and death were so preferred by those upholding virtues of self-dignity.

  Akbar had his mentor Bairam Khan killed, and then he married his wife who became his favourite queen. Historians claim that Bairam Khan was curiously attacked by a group of old enemies on his way to Mecca after he was forced to go there due to differences with Akbar.